ETs/EDs View of Earth! Image Credit: NASA via Wikimedia

ETs/EDs Announced Destruction Of Unha-3 Moments Ago (now 6:35 p.m. CDT)

ETs/EDs (extraterrestrials/extradimensionals) of the Liberation Forces reported clobbering the provocative North Korean missile launch in boost phase under a minute after ABC News reported a possible rocket failure.  The ETs/EDs reportedly used precisely targeted phaser fire from one of their ships to wipe out the rocket and payload in a single fiery bloom. That target could’ve been taken out via certain orbital Earth built weapons, but the ETs/EDs “didn’t trust them,” so acted immediately. The Unha-3 and payload were destroyed at an altitude of 75,459 feet (23 kilometers), according to the ETs/EDs. The engagement was conducted interdimensionally and, per the ETs/EDs, from just outside the atmosphere.

ETs/EDs Say North Korea Lied About The Payload

According to the ETs/EDs, there was no weather satellite aboard. Rather, the payload consisted of a full service weight dummy thermonuclear warhead and associated telemetry gear, and that is why the ETs/EDs downed the rocket. It was anything but peaceful in intent, and, judging from various news reports, the Japanese rightly viewed it as a threat and were prepared to act. But how?

Japan Can Defend Herself, ETs/EDs & Sensitive Terrestrial Sources Agree

The Japanese today weren’t bluffing, seeing as how Japan has had very advanced Patriot missiles for some time now and has Aegis guided missile cruisers, which have substantial antimissile capability in their own right. Originally put in place as a defense against China, these systems now have another foe with whom to contend, North Korea. That foe, though, never reckoned on launch interdiction by the ETs/EDs!  Today’s shootdown was intended by the ETs/EDs as a pointed reminder that highly charged provocative military acts and aggression won’t be tolerated. The ETs/EDs are sick of our endless fighting and wish we’d “learn to get along.” Maybe today’s object lesson will help.





Share →

141 Responses to ETs/EDs Disintegrate North Korean Unha-3 Rocket–Breaking!

  1. JMan says:

    Dear John,
    I mean no disrespect with this question.

    If ET/EDs are helping in this way and to this extent how could they have let the dissaster at Fukashima happen?

    The threat to mankind from this is beyond comprehension.


    • John Kettler says:


      In the overall scheme of things, preventing World War III from breaking out is way more important. The ETs/EDs are working very hard at dealing with the Fukushima mess, and people would’ve died like flies had they not done so.

    • anonymous says:

      Jman, the fatalities from Fukushima are minimal compared with the Asian tsunami which was NOT a natural event. Deaths from the latter came to 250K or thereabouts.

      Here’s an article on the Asian tsunami:

      Joe Vialls was not the only one who sussed that. Catherine Austin Fitts is another. In 2010, she gave an interview on RediceRadio. It’s archived and you need to be a subscriber to access this. She spoke of the Asian tsunami and why she believed that it was not a natural event. Before it happened, someone approached her for advice on a bond fund. She spent time researching various funds and came up with a recommendation. The client placed a substantial sum into that fund and shortly thereafter, just before the tsunami (maybe 1/2 weeks earlier) the fund dropped by about 20%. This is very significant for a bond fund. That fund had a large proportion invested in Indonesian bonds. The investor asked CAF for an explanation but she could find no reason for the fall. Then the tsunami struck…..

      Cui bono.

      • John Kettler says:


        I’m “told” the fatalities were more like 750,000. That’s from two different stellar races.

        • anonymous says:

          Do the ETs/EDs agree that the Asian tsunami was caused by a nuke in the seabed, as with the Japanese tsunami in 2011?

          Was it the intention of the NWO to decimate two stellar races or was it merely collateral damage?
          And who were these races?

          • Sunfire says:


            It was a series of 9 in sets of 3 that were used. Not just one. :) It was to “punish” Japan for telling the Cabal to “stuff it” when they had come to Japan seeking money in the early stretches of this whole financial fiasco. No connection to the two stellar races.

          • anonymous says:

            Thanks for the reply Sunfire.
            My question was mainly relating to the Asian tsunami some years ago – do the ETs/EDs agree that it too was caused by a nuke(s) placed on/in the seabed?

            John said the Asian tsunami had fatalities of 750K, from 2 stellar races. I wondered which races those were.

          • Sunfire says:

            Yes, they do agree, actually they were the ones that identified it first as a series of 9 in groups of 3, at least for us anyway. And, the two he was referring to were a couple of our sources, now that I remember what he wrote in his reply. So, we can’t identify them, between John and I we’re talking to about 6 different races now, at least last count I took anyway. :)

  2. Sloynaz says:

    I have two question to ask but dont know where to post them


  3. Keith says:

    Just saw the Veterans today post, can we read into the question, “Why Now?”

    • Sunfire says:

      Why now about what? I’m lost.

      • Keith says:

        I am sorry if I was not clear. Near the end of the VeteransToday article, there was a paragraph titled “WHY NOW, IS THIS PRE-STAGING “DISCLOSURE”

        • Sunfire says:

          ah, ok. No one expects disclosure to come from official government sources. Ever. From The ET/EDs? Yes, eventually, it’s there in their plans, no specific time frame though has ever been indicated. Veteranstoday though is a great resource for intel :).

  4. Darcy says:

    Curious if this is an american UFO or one from the liberation forces.

    • Sunfire says:

      I agree, definitely US Manufactured. That thing would never fly outside of our atmosphere.

  5. Talie says:

    Hi John

    Do your ETs/EDs ever see positive examples of elected government leaders?

    A recently retired Australian politician, ex Green’s Senator, Bob Brown, made a speech end of March regarding Earth’s guardianship and also mentioned Aliens. Of course the MSM ‘took the Mickey out of him’ regarding this speech (big surprise!).

    He has been an inspirational politician since the 1960’s and has fought for environmental solutions and equality. He was Australia’s first openly gay politician (announced in the 1970’s).

    I’m not much into politics, but did vote for Greens the last few elections.

    Here is his speech:
    “Bob Brown delivers the 3rd annual Green Oration”

    And a response from the HeraldSun (MSM):

    “Bob Brown’s alien theory is off the planet”


    • John Kettler says:


      I think they’re so busy with primary, time urgent tasks that analyzing politics is not high on their priorities.

      • Talie says:

        Hi John

        I’m sorry if my commment appeared to suggest that the ET/ED contingent waste their time in any way. I am very grateful for their contribution. However, my suggestion was related to your comment …

        “The ETs/EDs are sick of our endless fighting and wish we’d’learn to get along’.”

        From reading your blog, it appears that the ETs/EDs have formed their opinions of Terrans based on the small percentage of self-elected officials that are intent on blowing up the world and anyone that doesn’t agree with them. Much of the peacocking, threats and the “my nuclear arsenal is bigger than your nuclear arsenal” diatribe is all about politics and the ETs/EDs are already involved in such.

        I was trying to point out that some of the “good guys” do get through to higher official positions and hold their integrity throughout.

        I can’t wait for the day when these show ponies are removed and us earth-bound humans get a chance to show our true colours of strength, compassion and endless creative endeavour.

        Keep up the good work.

        • John Kettler says:


          Understood, and thanks!

        • Jan says:

          it is not OUR endless fighting it is the Dark cabal..not us. they manufacture fear & want this planet to be owned by just them,not us, they want the planet & the galaxy for themselves. by cutting back our horns, we are made weaker, they like us weak, they do not like us strong, i never made a war, did you?
          i will not agree to the fact we make the so called shadow gov;

  6. darylluke says:


    Am I missing something? Your article states it was “dummy warhead”. So, if that is the case, it was no threat to anyone nor anything if it had a blank-shell, right? Why even bother shooting it down?

    Maybe I’m missing something and/or you can clarify this.


    • John Kettler says:


      If you look at North Korea’s official statements before launch, it was officially described as carrying a weather satellite. North Korea had already been strictly warned by the international community about missile firings, so for it to launch a missile that was full up weapon lacking only an actual warhead was extremely provocative. such tests are conducted for two primary reasons: a) evaluate the performance of a weapon about to enter operational service; or, b) verify continuing reliability of an existing missile fleet. South Korea and Japan alike felt threatened and said so publicly, both saying they would shoot it down if it entered their airspace. So, North Korea flexed its muscles–and got spanked by the ETs/EDs.

  7. Shama-an says:

    Footage of UFO near rocket:

    • Jan says:

      Tracker beam is the answer,you can create a sort of force field..around the target and trigger the target at a certain height, they would wait to the missile was over the yellow sea before it was brought down so as not to cause fatalities .

  8. Jason Ramsey says:

    Timely! Minor problem though…the missile broke up after less than a minute of flying time and was observed visually disintegrating over the Yellow Sea, with a number of large pieces. It was in no way 7 miles high. It was reported as a first stage separation failure issue. How did it get to 7 miles high to be destroyed by particle weapons or whatever used by ETs and EDs?

    • Sunfire says:

      There is some great differences between what WAS reported by MSM and then what was reported by our ET/ED’s and confirmed by multiple ground sources, something else to keep in mind, our ET/ED’s were also the FIRST to report that it was in fact a dummy warhead and not the Satellite that N. Korea claimed. We always side with our sources over Mainstream Media Sources.