YU 55 The Hidden History

Asteroid 2005 YU 55
Credit: YU 55 radar image via by Goldstone Deep Space Communications Facility

YU 55, formally, Asteroid 2000 YU 55,  originally 1/4 mile across, 8/10 of the distance from here to the Moon (~200,000 nautical miles = YU 55‘s distance from Earth) and traveling fast enough, 30,000 mph, to cause massive Pacific-wide tsunamis and crack the ocean floor if YU 55 had hit, has now been diverted and will NOT hit the Earth. Informed sources do NOT say whether Earth will be pelted with radioactive meteorites as a result of this first successful diversion of an inbound asteroid via human weaponry. That weaponry was thermonuclear, a converted MK? gravity bomb of 3-5 megaton yield, launched from Vandenberg Air Force Base (AFB), Launch Complex Five, California on some variety of the problematic Atlas-Centaur rocket in a crash effort Tuesday, November 8, 2011 “sometime betweeen midnight and 1 a.m. local time.” Detonation was confirmed through an electromagnetic pulse (EMP) received by radio telescopes at Arecibo Observatory, Puerto Rico and the National Radio Astronomy Observatory, Green Bank. West Virginia.

YU 55 —  Alarming Coincidences

“Coincidentally,” the expected impact window, November 9-10, saw the EXERCISE PACIC WAVE 11 (tsunami response) in full swing, and the FCC’s conducting a “communication exercise” Tuesday, November 8.  As the video explains, Asteroid YU 55 Info on YouTube, there are way too many “coincidences” occurring at once, especially to those of us who recall the scenario being gamed on 9/11, which just “happened” to mirror what actually occurred, and that fulfilled the “New Pearl Harbor” desired by the Project for a New American Century (PNAC).

YU 55 — “The Lie Is Different at Every Level” (Richard Hoagland)

YU 55 seems to fit Mr. Hoagland’s insider quote, obtained from a military intelligence officer, to a “T.” The media kept/were kept quiet, public officials were not at all forthcoming, yet a complicated, large scale tsunami disaster relief force for a YU 55 strike was already in place, its presence covered by the long-planned above exercise, itself suspicious; communication links were quietly tested by the FCC, and an all-out effort was mounted by Vandenberg AFB to avert a disastrous asteroid strike using a cobbled together impromptu launch platform and warhead combination to do what had never been done before–divert an onrushing asteroid, in this case, YU 55. While those involved in the effort were jubilant, there has been zero information since, which may mean we’re not out of the woods yet, especially if radioactive chunks of YU 55 are still inbound. If so, these pieces of YU 55 will strike Earth “sometime next week.”


The YU 55 story presented above now has a wholly unexpected Cold War plot twist. It turns out that the warhead, contrary to earlier reports, was not a converted U.S. thermonuclear gravity bomb, but something far more unusual–a 3-megaton Russian R-12/ SS-4 SANDAL IRBM (Intermediate Range Ballistic Missile) warhead assembled from obsolete Russian warheads sent to the United States for safe disassembly and disposal when the Cold War ended.  The SS-4 SANDAL is the very same IRBM whose installation in Cuba triggered the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis, and its use, by the U.S., to attempt to divert YU 55 is remarkable, to say the least!



Share →

24 Responses to YU 55 Asteroid Reportedly Diverted by Thermonuclear Blast!

  1. John F. says:

    that YouTube site reminds me of SCI-FI TV Channel mind control, makes me wonder how many ETs are vying for this planet & its resources inclu-
    ding us of course. World domination seems to be an eternal top game

    • Trugli Vartna says:

      John F: I don’t choose to believe much that comes down the internet pipeline, but this Atlanticobr site helps me believe in the benevolent and protective nature of Creation … particularly at a time when integrity seems to be a lost art. A lot of “channeled” information is just a bunch of dribble, but this Andromedan cat –“Mythi Sicphephics” — puts out information that is highly credible and evidential enough for me to believe we are getting more help on the pathway to freedom than we are aware of. It also gives me something more for which to be grateful and positive. World domination is for what I call the “Undeveloped” souls. Freedom, wisdom, and unbridled power are for the Creators who know how to handle it, as well as who they are, where they come from, and why. It’s the road considerably less well-traveled.
      Trugli Vartna

      • John Kettler says:


        Will have to take a look at it, and the “90% of everything is garbage” rule seems truer than ever there. As for help, we need all we can get!

      • Surferess says:

        I agree, I like the Mythi stuff. I am one of their youtube subscribers and follow them consistently. I like it b/c it is off-world info but from a second source other than the GFoL. Don’t get me wrong, I love the GFoL, but it is always nice to get a story from different perspectives for clarity and confirmation.

        • John Kettler says:


          According to multiple contacts, both here and “there,” the GFoL is an extremely dangerous machine intelligence operating from a practically unkillable giant ship. Please see my FAQ on things that aren’t what they seem to be.

  2. Trugli Vartna says:

    John: Interesting bit of somewhat contradicting info from Atlanticobr:
    Taken From: http://www.youtube.com/user/atlanticobr?feature=watch
    Video 68
    Friends of our channel and YouTubers welcome. Answers of an alien from Andromeda – video sixty eighth – November 2, 2011.
    Friends, I had to do a 5-day trip which prevented contact with Mythi. Yesterday we could talk and exchange some information. I received many many emails about the YU-55 and follow what was explained to me: –
    The perihelion of the YU-55 as you call it was diverted to demonstrate the presence of extraterrestrial intelligence for the entire population of planet Earth. Its trajectory was sidetracked by the influence of Krulian ship which followed the Elenin comet, a comet which was also “ordered” to this action. The comet YU-55, will be accompanied by your astronomers and may be diverted to reach the Moon and it will be operated by spacecraft, all seen by you in real time. If the YU-55 reaches the moon on Nov. 8, a great rain of debris will be attracted by the gravitational pull of Earth, possibly neutralizing your communication systems, plus the trail of the comet Elenin scheduled to begin the first effects of this early month. Even though it is not directed to reach the lunar surface, the whole movement of spacecraft will provide the necessary disclosure for the moment, a fact that thousands of people on your planet may be seen with regular telescopes, without the censoring of your governments. –
    The Community Galactica requested the total evacuation of all activities on the Moon since the approach of Elenin already setting the stage for this event. Scheduled after this revelation, the “solar system Nibiru” may be placed on the original route again; it is being moved forward by the “spaceship Krulian” and is causing orbital changes and declination of the axes of the planets in outer orbits, especially on Saturn and Jupiter which are more easily observed. This is a decision to be taken in the wake of these events, and you if so, will finally see the two suns in a few months.

    Video 69
    Answers of an alien from Andromeda – video sixty nine – November 10, 2011.
    Friends, I came here at the insistence of CB to comment on these points and I return in about three days for a new conversation. We are assisting the Arcturians in an operation to remove a submarine base near the island Socotra in the Arabian Sea. As you could follow, the asteroid YU-55 was diverted from his route to the moon by Krulian ship, bringing it a little more close to Earth’s orbit, and that made your astronomers make corrections in the distances of Earth flyby. The Community Galactica decided to hinder the plans by the current elite of your planet, they were advised by Pleiadeans. If major natural disasters to happen at the moment as they were certain and confident, would facilitate the plan of genocide. A large craft Krulian passed near the planet covering the effects of meteorites, the trail of Elenin, which would disable your communications in early November.
    Your elites are losing time, they could not count on Elenin, nor with the YU-55, and not with the system Nibiru in its correct time, and so will they lose control of the situation soon. Unfortunately, at first, you are in the midst of planned retaliation for them but will not for long. The reptilians are unable to voice any participation, because their activities are practically suspended on Earth by orders of the Community Galactica that is, your elites will be without any coverage. The military movements clearly demonstrate the purpose of this game, putting the nation against nation, especially in more populated areas of the planet. For your elites this is a game with marked cards, everyone involved knows exactly what role they should play the game of populational elimination.

    • John Kettler says:


      A lot to digest! Have sent it “upstairs” for comment. I was “told” that YU-55 was originally NOT on a collision course with Earth, but some unspecified encounter had changed its trajectory.

    • John Kettler says:


      Please copy this comment to my newest Yu 55 post, the one with the Cat People.It may explain the previously unspecified trajectory deviation.

  3. Brian says:

    Lord William MacGregor, KBE, PhD, ScD, PhD, RAS, RAA

    So secretive that the enigmatic Lordship doesn’t appear anywhere except as deceased and minus a few qualifications. Incredible he has access to the internet…;-)

    PS RAA should in fact be RA in case your google fu failed to notice, and no the polymathic Lord isn’t on record as belonging there either


    Some noteworthy people of the name MacGregor

    Sir William MacGregor (1846-1919), British colonial administrator, governor of Newfoundland (1904-1909), and Queensland, Australia (1909-1914)
    Air Vice-Marshal Andrew MacGregor (1897-1983), World War I flying ace, recipient of the Distinguished Flying Cross
    Joanna MacGregor (b. 1959), British classical, jazz, and contemporary pianist
    Alasdair Alpin MacGregor (1899-1970), Scottish writer and photographer
    Ewan MacGregor (b. 1971), Scottish actor, best known for his role as the young Obi-Wan Kenobi in the Star Wars prequel trilogy
    John MacGregor (1825-1892), Scottish explorer, travel writer and philanthropist
    Sir Ian Kinloch MacGregor KBE (1912-1998), Scottish metallurgist and industrialist
    Sir Colin MacGregor, Chief Justice in Jamaica
    Douglas Macgregor (1906-1964), American industrial psychologist
    John_MacGregor (1889-1952), Canadian recipient of the Victoria Cross during the First World War

    • John Kettler says:


      The review was published, exactly as submitted. It’s not my job to vet reviews. It’s my job to screen and answer comments, such as yours. As I said, not all things are public. For instance, quite a few people have private FB pages, yet somehow you don’t come unglued over that. Am convinced His Lordship is quite real, every bit as much as your terrier like worrying of the matter! Thanks for the clan MacGregor update, too.

  4. Skywise says:

    Have you ever considered you are gullible.



    Lord John MacGregor of Pulham Market OBE PC FKC (He was made a life peer as Baron MacGregor of Pulham Market, of Pulham Market in the County of Norfolk on 5 July 2001)

    • John Kettler says:


      I’ve said my piece. After rechecking with sources of multiply proven reliability, I have found no reason to modify my previous comment. Am quite satisfied His Lordship is real, whether or not you can find him in available public records. The British are famous for protecting their privacy, you know, especially the hereditary peerage.

  5. Skywise says:

    Lord William MacGregor, KBE, PhD, ScD, PhD, RAS, RAA wrote “gush”

    John. Pity you aren’t as questioningly thorough when it comes to checking the identity of ‘Lord MacGregor’ (20 October 1846 – 3 July 1919) on your home page. lol


    • John Kettler says:


      Did you consider that the title could be inherited and that there may be a lineal descendant of the dead lord who now bears the same name and title?

  6. Dr Verity Lambert OBE says:

    When approaching an article like this kettlerian woo it is good to keep in mind several questions to ask:
    • First, who are the named sources for information? Are they credible? Knowledgeable?
    • Second, do the anonymous sources sound credible? Is there a credible reason for their anonymity? And are the anonymous sources quoted, or are they merely paraphrased?
    • Third, does the article contain any information that you can actually check yourself using other sources?
    • Fourth, is the logic of the article internally consistent? In other words, does any part of the article contradict or not fit well with other parts of the article?
    • And finally, how does the logic of the article hold up? Does it make sense in light of what we know about the world?

    • John Kettler says:

      When approaching a comment like this seemingly reasonable one, it is necessary to ask:
      *Why is this this person employing as a lead the dismissive characterization “kettlerian woo” to describe my deadly earnest post?
      *Does this person exist, in the title specified? Verity Lambert OBE did exist, but died in 2007. She was neither an M.D. nor held any kind of doctorate that I can see. Oops! For shame, trading on the name and reputation of a dead woman! http://www.thisisannouncements.co.uk/5850360

      *My sources are unnamed, to ensure they stay alive. Anonymous sources are a well-established journalistic reality. Typically, they are used to prevent political repercussions, job loss, criminal prosecution and worse. In my field, the stakes are literally life and death. My sources are highly credible and knowledgeable. In some cases, I quote directly; in others, I paraphrase in order to not compromise the source. Where I do so, I say so. There are checkable elements, but you either have to have insider contacts, do a lot of legwork, or be lucky. Regarding internal consistency, my post is highly consistent, as is your effort to make me look bad. I wonder why?

  7. Janos Clare says:

    “The Vandenberg observer page was a good read, but it failed to cover the launch window and event you dispute.”

    The site covered observations of the most recent launches from Vandenberg with the last launch on Oct 28th 2011, there have been no launches to date since.

    Perhaps you could ask your ‘sources’ if the ‘deflection’ by the ‘nuclear tipped rocket’ occurred as YU55 was approaching earth, or at it’s closest distance to the earth or after it had passed.



    You said the launch was “Tuesday, November 8, 2011 “sometime betweeen midnight and 1 a.m. local time”

    Closest approach Nov 8 3:28 p.m. PST (6:28 p.m. EST/1128 UTC)

    • John Kettler says:

      Janos Clare,

      Your Keck link said the observatory “would try” to image the asteroid, and the second link’s video clearly indicates the asteroid is going away from Earth. We don’t know if anything was seen in the first case, while in the second, the issue is moot. Keck’s in Hawaii atop Mauna Kea, and such telescopes generally don’t fare well during daytime, there being way too much light to detect small, distant objects traveling at high speed and having very little optical contrast. My sources inform me that the entire matter has gone deep black since the intercept and detonation. Returning briefly to Vandenberg, a launch at the time indicated would not have had much air traffic to deal with, hence, no need for notification to flight crews, unless immediately in the area.

  8. Janos Clare says:


    Please read all the comments about observers seeing & hearing launches from Vandenberg from all over California. Also they would restrict civilian aircraft flying in that area at times of launches but there is no record for any such restriction taking place around that time. So add silencing pilots into your list of people involved in your conspiracy Population of California, International observatories, etc.

    High altitude and space nuclear tests (discontinued in 1967) showed that EMP pulses and radiation would damage satellites. I can find no reports of satellites malfunctioning in early November from any country.

    High-altitude and space explosions tend to manifest a spherical ‘cloud,’ reminiscent of other space-based explosions until distorted by Earth’s magnetic field, and the charged particles resulting from the blast can cross hemispheres to create an auroral display which has led one filmmaker to characterize these detonations as ‘the rainbow bombs’. The visual effects of a high-altitude or space-based explosion may last longer than atmospheric tests, sometimes in excess of 30 minutes and lead to highly visible Aurora effects as radiation impacted/interacted with earth’s magnetic field in the upper atmosphere.

    See Starfish Prime pictures


    Have you any evidence at all that the US launched and exploded a nuclear device at YU55 and destroyed it?

    • John Kettler says:

      Janos Clare,

      The Vandenberg observer page was a good read, but it failed to cover the launch window and event you dispute. Your point about HANE (High Altitude Nuclear Explosions) is well taken, but there’s a world of difference between Starfish Prime’s mere ~25 nmi and the putatutive 200,00 nmi I reported, and the effects fall off over distance. Further, solar activity lately has been extreme, and I suspect it’d put more stress on satellites than the EMP from that far away would. The Earth’s magnetic field has been repeatedly beaten in by CMEs (coronal mass ejections), considerably minimizing the auroral effects. When the aurora’s being seen in Cuba, a small additional increment, if seen, would be unlikely to excite comment. I congratulate you on digging up Starfish Prime and quoting from its Wiki, and I acknowledge I oopsed on some of the phenomenology, but it’s been years since I read Glasstone’s classic The Effects of Nuclear Weapons. Bear in mind, though, that even the highest manmade nuclear burst in space, per the chart, has been only around 125 nmi miles up–and we’re talking 200,000 nmi! As for your other question, I stand by my sources. The technological means exist to, inter alia, simulate the Second Coming via Project Blue Beam. If we can do that, and I have it on excellent authority we can,why can’t we hide a rocket launch?

      Project Blue Beam (excerpt from here Fair Use http://forum.davidicke.com/showthread.php?t=29038 )

      The Blue Beam Project will pretend to be the universal fulfillment of the prophesies of old, as nature and even as that which took place 2,000 years ago.

      In principal, it will make use of the sky as a movie screen, a space based laser generating satellite projects simultaneous images to the four corners of the planet in every language and in every dialect according to region. It deals with the religion aspect of the new world order and is a large scale seduction.

      Computers will coordinate the satellite and software will run the show and tell. Holography is based on very nearly identical signal, combining to produce an image or hologram with deep perception which is equally applicable ?? to ELF, VLF and LF waves. It is an optical phenomena.

      Specifically, the show will consist of laser projection of multiple holographic images to different parts of the world, each receiving a different according to predominating regional/national religious faith. Not a single area will be excluded.

      With computer animation and sound effects appearing to come from the depths of space, astonished followers of the various creeds will witness their own returned messiah in spectacularly convincing life-like realness.
      An earlier version using surface based platforms was nearly used operationally many years ago. Further, my information is that by the late 1960s, black program holography, as opposed to its puny open source cousin, could put a credible image of a person on the stool next to you.

      Coming to your last question, I never said “destroyed,” I said “diverted.” Huge difference! The NUDET simply moved the asteroid onto an orbital path which wouldn’t hit Earth.

  9. Janos Clare says:

    Even it was unannounced the Vandenberg is in proximity (14km) from the public plus the plumes and noise would make any launch almost impossible to keep secret. There is no record in the amateur rocket followers of any unannounced launches for the date you specified or any other date.

    The same applies for to a nuclear detonation happening to YU55 which was being observed by many amateur and professional observatories the world over. No observer saw it light up in the manner you suggest or have reported any untoward occurrence. You conspiracy theory must accounfor many thousands of independent observers being complicit in the plot.

    • John Kettler says:

      Janos Clare,

      Were such an effort to be mounted, it would be what’s called a USAP (Unacknowledged Special Access Program), which means the government is allowed to lie about it, if questioned. The government would strongly prefer the public never know how close Earth came to taking a major asteroid strike, so remains silent. Having lived in California myself, I can assure you that you can’t always even tell when a missile has been launched, let alone why or equipped with what. My sources tell me missions with classified payloads aren’t even announced. And what would happen, in eco-mad California, were it to become known the government was about to loft a nuke, no matter how good the reason? The launch was late at night or early in the morning, depending on your viewpoint, and it could well have been masked by aircraft operating in the area. Major observatories are subject to government control via their funding (then-astronomer Jacques Vallee reports seeing UFOs being removed from the observatory sighting logs in France), and the impact took place in broad daylight. Nuclear phenomenology in space is quite different in space than on Earth, for there is no blast wave and no mushroom cloud, there being no atmosphere, after all. If the event took place 200,000 nmi from Earth (might’ve been closer), on/near an object 1/4 mile across, you’re talking a tiny thing at a very long distance, with the very real possibility the detonation itself may’ve been masked from most observers, coupled with a very short duration event, easily missed. As I said, our perception of a nuclear detonation (NUDET) is based on firings within the atmosphere, and space has no long duration nuclear burst phenomena, other than residual radiation. In other words, no mushroom cloud, just a short, high intensity flash, coupled with a very high energy pulse, in this case intended to create an orbital deviation by slightly displacing the YU 55’s flight path.

      Frankly, I find myself wondering whether the real objection here is to the event itself and what it means, rather than the how it was done side. I trust my sources, which have been repeatedly shown to be reliable,

  10. Janos Clare says:

    “Launch Complex Five, California on some variety of the problematic Atlas-Centaur rocket in a crash effort Tuesday, November 8, 2011 ” Link please

    Nearest I can find is a launch on Oct. 28, 2011, Delta II 7920 from Vandenberg of an earth orbiting satellite.



    “Detonation was confirmed through an electromagnetic pulse (EMP) received by radio telescopes at Arecibo Observatory, Puerto Rico and Jodrell Bank Observatory, United Kingdom.” Link [lease

    • John Kettler says:

      Janos Clare,

      Regret to inform you that not all launches are announced to the public. There used to be a great deal more openness in this area, but the overall trend has been toward ever more secrecy, to include unannounced launches and lying about payloads, among other things. For a discussion of how much things have changed in this sensitive arena, please see Paglen’s seminal Blank Spots on the Map, in the chapter on space.

      Sensitive sources provided confirmation the weapon detonated and that the named facilities detected the nuclear detonation (NUDET) signature, so, no link.